Saturday, May 1, 2010

Will the Hawaiian cameo do the trick?

Do you like my disguises?

Nicole has been in Hawaii filming a cameo for the Jennifer Aniston/Adam Sandler film Just Go With It. So small is Nicole's part that she had plenty of time to hang out at the beach with daughter Sunday Rose and jog in her favourite black tracksuit. Jogging when you are that thin surely isn't good for the heart.

This cameo appearance may all be part of her new agent's "Reinvention of Nicole" strategy. You know, to slowly re-introduce her to the public after a string of flops. If this film fails, Nicole can say that she was only in it for 10 seconds, so cannot be held to blame.

12 comments:

maclen said...

Yeah, to quote yogi berra...this is like "deja vu all over again" So, two films kidman "passed" on last year, woody allen's "You will meet a tall dark stranger" and the valerie plame biopic "Fair Game" are both screening at Cannes and have already picked up distribution...while Rabbit Hole remains highly MIA. I would be tempted to say that RH is being left to lanquished in never never land because, as you point out Choice, the film no longer fits into kidman's new management strategy. And that is a small bit part in a generic RomCom...that's all that needs to be kept pointed out!

whatchasayy said...

Anyone realized it or occur to you that we have been witnessing her with her baby shots, ALWAYS the baby carried the same way, perched on one side of her hips, FOR YEARS AND YEARS, only her clothing and sceneries change. This fits in with her rigid mentality about anything. Other celebrity babies are captured INTERACTING with their parents, walking, tuned into/curious about their surroundings, independently enjoying themselves. HERS always look lost...and semi-retarded...not tuned into herself at all. BTW, you get like that when you talk at and not with the baby, the baby's brains aren't used to turning, not getting attention to convey who she is, and she already looks slow. Also has there been a picture at all of KU taking ownership of the baby and enjoy her the way other celebrity dads do, like placing kisses, or lift her up to make her giggle, etc. Of course, not having your own baby is no doubt a large part of it in this weird family....

whatchasayy said...

...'member one picture that was captured on family patio in AU, NK glowering over this baby. Other celebrity moms are pure putty to their babies' whims at her baby's age. I don't blame her baby at all when she grows up despising her mom....

Choice said...

Whatchasay - yes, the way she holds the baby is quite odd. No maternal connection evident. I guess the Nanny is hiding in the bushes nearby ??? The Nanny is probably who Sunday really adores.

maclen said...

Yes, I do believe a former nanny to ex-cruise's from back in the 90's when he was still married to kidman, and said the entire time she worked for ex-cruise she very rarely noticed any involvement with his kids by kidman. That would certainly explain why his kids...connor and bella...no longer have a relationship with kidman. She just never made any substansive connection to them. Kidman is no doubt content to only get a v-mail from them occasionally. Clearly if kidman could actually exploit them with, you know, pre arranged photo ops like with her "PR baby" sunry...there would be photos of kidman with the older kids of ex-cruise...in the past 4 or 5 years! I predict, just as there are no pics of kidman and ex-cruise since the split...it seems there will never be a another photo of kidman and ex-cruise's kids.

whatchasayy said...

Re my entry at 12:23 AM, was feeling very pathetic and ridiculous about the consistent theme of her baby pictures, ALWAYS carried on her hip, FOREVER since she was born so wouldn't be "years and years" (I know) She sure is old enough to move and play around exercising her will and freedom to do what she wants like a little person...she's not some semi-catatonic humanoid on mom's hip. Choice, thanks for capping my description, that's it, no maternal connection!

Choice said...

Interesting points Maclen. Do you get the feeling Tom never wants to be photographed with Gran again?

maclen said...

Choice said...
"Interesting points Maclen. Do you get the feeling Tom never wants to be photographed with Gran again?"

Yeah... it is a fact that there are no photos of kidman and ex-cruise together since the split...which was 9 years ago! Despite all the PR BS just after the divorce about how they split "amicably" for the "sake of the kids"...you will not find one photo...or even a rumor of ex-cruise and kidman seen spending any of the kids birthdays...or holidays spent together...for the "sake of the kids"...it never happens. I get the feeling ex-cruise had had enough of kidman's toxic personality to last the rest of his life.

maclen said...

whatchasayy said...
"Re my entry at 12:23 AM, was feeling very pathetic and ridiculous about the consistent theme of her baby pictures, ALWAYS carried on her hip, FOREVER since she was born so wouldn't be "years and years""

Ha! I just recently saw this pic of when kidman was out hiking with her "pr baby"...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1270857/Shes-got-Nicole-Kidman-straps-daughter-Sunday-Rose-tightly-hike-Maui-mountains.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

...and my initial reaction was..."What happened to baby sunry's head?" Had kidman simply taken a doll in place of her kid...and had the doll's head fallen off? Seems little sunry was was out cold, and the nanny simply place the hood on over head and kidman lugged her around like a closed sack of potatos! It does seem true, this kid is NOT animated at all. Her facial features clearly take after the orb...but her bland expressionless demeanor she clearly gets from kidman. This kid will not be another suri cruise...who has more public personality than kidman and orb combined.

Choice said...

Maclen - Many would argue that their marriage was just a convenience thing back then. To boost her career and to hide his homosexuality. Didn't Mimi Rogers have a few interesting things to say about Tom when they split?

whatchasayy said...

Maclean wrote: "...kidman lugged her around like a closed sack of potatos!"

We haven's seen anything human or real from her in most of the things she does. You're right, who in the right mind carries around their babies like that? This baby by someone is merely an accessaroy to NK, a mere PR toy for her...to seem occupied, to seem more humane...but like anything of hers lame, sloppy and half-a**ed, just makes us feel sorry for this baby. Her real mother should be cursed! BTW, the timing of her surgery requiring hospital stay of several days while married to cruise, no utrus rumor, ectopic pregnancy to 2nd miscarriage, cruise's profession that she can't have children, etc.etc. this someone else's baby is specifically that, not hers, no genuine maternal affections for this baby. A real mother would have let this sleepy baby (if not drugged) rest in peace somewhere....

maclen said...

Choice said...
"Maclen - Many would argue that their marriage was just a convenience thing back then. To boost her career and to hide his homosexuality."

yeah choice, celebs must not just juggle whatever personal peccadilloes they may have but their oh so important public images. They have privacy contracts with personal help...gag orders...etc. Everything is negotiated!