Thursday, May 28, 2009

'Kidman Tummy' on show again

Some of the world media are once again claiming Nicole is pregnant after she stepped out on Wednesday night in a red nightie - revealing a tummy or bump. 

How often do they need to be reminded that it's more likely the 'Kidman tummy' that is on display ... the one all the Kidman women have.  Nicole, you must learn to suck in when the Paps are watching you! 

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

nah, it's a cushion.

dontlikethepez said...

Does this dried up has been have any clothes that aren't either frumpy or just plain sleazy??? There is no "tweener" with her except of course the ball cap and black work out clothes!

Anonymous said...

Part 1.

It's obvious Kidman has had no surgery. What is amazing when I read these opinions, is that Kidman at 41 is always compared to Kidman at 20. Additionally, they never show a photo of her sister or father's faces.

Kidman is 20 years OLDER.20! her jawline is loose and sagging. The vertical nasolabial creases aren't looking very good either (the vertical lines on the sides of her smile). her cheeks are loose and saggy.

I did see the movie Australia and her forehead was constantly creased,, furrowed, wrinkled to a point where she NEEDED botox. Her chi was saggy as well. Still very pretty, but I've never seen her look so old, or is it her own age?

Her nose is exactly the same nose as her sister and father and hasn't changed. Thinned and drooped with age, yes. Surgery? no.

What has changed? She is almost 42.
Kidman has lost a great deal of body fat and perhaps is 15 pounds less than she was at 21(the Rolling Stone cover). Us older woman know, that after 38 there is a choice, either you face or your ass. Only one can remain high. If you choose you ass, you face sages, if you gain the 20 lbs. needed to keep your face plump and pretty, your ass grows. It's an old adage and it's true.

Faces age, they appear longer, sharper, thinner, the fat on the cheekbones slips down below the bone, the bones protrude, while the lower face becomes heavy.

Kidman in particular has had quite a bit of fat slippage. Her lower face is becoming unattractive from the side, heavy.

She obviously uses botox and in the past, either her doctor overdid the units or the bad photos were taken before it settled.

EVERY actress uses botox, so does every lawyer, doctor, and woman who makes over 80k a year. Not a big deal. It is ONLY injected in the forehead to decrease lines and near the crows feet to soften the laugh lines. It does not alter the face in any other way. The lines don't vanish, they only soften. If placed between the brows, it does raise the brows a fraction, that is what is being done, a non-surgical mini-lift. I wish it wroked better, I still have 60% of my crows feet and need an eye lift. It's just not that powerful, it dsoes however give a smooth forehead, not a bigger one or a shinier one, alas. Over 40, smooth is good.

Anonymous said...

Part 2.


EVERY actress uses botox, so does every lawyer, doctor, and woman who makes over 80k a year. Not a big deal. It is ONLY injected in the forehead to decrease lines and near the crows feet to soften the laugh lines. It does not alter the face in any other way. The lines don't vanish, they only soften. If placed between the brows, it does raise the brows a fraction, that is what is being done, a non-surgical mini-lift. I wish it wroked better, I still have 60% of my crows feet and need an eye lift. It's just not that powerful, it dsoes however give a smooth forehead, not a bigger one or a shinier one, alas. Over 40, smooth is good.

We need to be fair, very few women are religious with sunscreen, hats, long sleeves, and scarves as has been Kidman. Sun causes all aging, she is ahead of the game as she started very young, not for vanity, because of skin cancer risk. I've no doubt she'd kill to have a tan.

Other than natural aging, the only "surgery", Kidman has had is Rystalene, which is not surgery at all.

It is an injectable, the same one Cindy Crawford is addicted to and the rest of the world. It is a natural substance injected to add volume to creases and lips. Kidman has it injected in her lips. It's an office visit, 10 minutes, 5 pinpricks, out to lunch, not surgery.

I don't like the look on her. I hate it on Meg Ryan. Both they and Melanie Griffith had the same cute little mouth and now they resemble ducks. Kidman uses the least of the three. Lisa Rinna is the worst offender.

The truth is that Kidman needed it, all lips thin with age. Chanel started it for the perfume ad campaigns, she has continued the shots. It lasts about 2 years, so she has to have it redone then. Why? Like most women, the same old reason, it makes her feel pretty.

It's her choice. No one else's.
It does however alter her appearance in comparison to older pictures. Again, her choice. When I reach 40, I may use it also, but only enough to maintain, not plump more then my natural pout. But, then again, we are not actresses who are photographed incessantly suffering the criticise and analysis of strangers (like me).

[in my experience, being dumped for a younger woman by a philandering, Penelope Cruz? can makes a woman feel unattractive, leading to haircolor changes, weight loss, and a need to appear younger. It only lasts a few years. I can't imagine having the director's of Chanel asking me to have injections. I'd die of embarrassment, but welcome the make-over, I guess?]


Kidman had had no surgery to the trained eye (me, a plastic surgical nurse). However, soon she will need a lower face lift. Gravity is taking it's toll.

Caveat: Kidman would never need anything if she wasn't an actress. Only to be able to a size 6, instead of a size 2. Amzingly, more food would make her look very young. But, that, in the movie business, is NOT a choice.

I've seen her in person. She is amazing beautiful and looks only about 34, but as an actress in youth obsessed Hollywood? I feel sorry for her (in that one regard).

Anonymous said...

Forget the stomach. That's something she has always had. Remember. She said that she has to keep a little roundness, so hubby will stay. LOL. But does she have a stylist at all? Looks like she went out for coffee in her nightgown. Geez.

Choice said...

Anon Part 1 and 2 - thank you for your views. Always welcome here.Good to see other people's point of view.

Linda said...

Kidman has had no surgery? But she IS known the world over as being famous for her Botox abuse to the point that last year Botox specialists (and they should know) at an industry conference called her out and publically stated that she was singlehandedly giving Botox injections a bad name.
Fellow Celebrities (Sharon Osborne & Simon Cowell) have also namechecked Kidman when talking about Botox. On the release of her last film Australia, critics made reference to her immobile frozen facial expression. All very strange for a woman who claims to be 'completely natural' don't you think?
Kylie Minogue also claimed to be 'completely natural' until she recently fessed up and admitting being a Botox junkie and to having had some 'work' done.

Movie Stars lie about the work they've had done - all the time! My feeling is that there's no smoke without fire.

Anonymous said...

I have no problem with people using Botox or other enhancements. But when they claim that they are all natural as Kidman has done, that's when I have problems.

Imahick said...

I agree that it's not the use of the botox or lip enhancements that bother me. It's her claiming to be all natural that I object to.

As far as the work she's had done, the lips are not attractive. I've heard that in real life, NK is a beautiful woman. In the early to mid-90's, I thought she was stunning, but now she looks very "plastic" to me. She always appears very "tense" or stiff looking and she is way too thin. She needs to gain a bit of weight to soften her appearance.

Anonymous said...

Botox isn't cosmetic surgery, its an injection that wears off. There's no cutting of the skin so it can't be considered in the same league. I've had it a number of times. Works a treat buts its expensive. I sometimes think all the griping about it is just sour grapes from women who'd love to get some but can't afford it.

I also don't believe Kidman has had her face cut - yet. I do believe however that she's had breast implants. Take it from somewone with experience, once you've had one surgery its really easy to justify another and for this reason, I reckon she's had lipo as well.

Choice said...

Anon 5:51 1/6/09. Nicole had a nose job several years ago. There was also speculation that she had a boob job. I agree that botox and lip work aren't true forms of surgery.

Anonymous said...

I just cannot, for the life of me, see evidence of a nose job - her nose has always been like that, its the same as her sisters. Its beautiful face-on but in profile its kinda snooty - sticks up and out a little too much. The Chanel people obviously agree with me because her nose in the No. 5 print ad is obviously photoshopped. The boobs, on the other hand are more obvious to me and probably anyone who remembers the singlet scene in Eyes Wide.

Frewt

Anonymous said...

Never been preggers before but don't most navels protrude out in pregnancy? Not necessarily...whatever. Everything about this lady appears contrived somehow. Couldn't ever stop the speculation that she was pregnant or not the first time...what's so difficult about quieting such nonsense if one was pregnant. Okay, moving on!

Anonymous said...

To Anon 8:33 PM, can see her younger breasts in "Portraits of a Lady" and naked in Billy Bathgate. Her nakedness is quite unremarkable considering at the height of her physical beauty unable to wow audience then; and like today, as written by English reporter following Australia, (to the effect that) in spite of controlled wooden walk in all her latexness, suprisingly? she had morphed to a sexless presence. Recent pictures of her show her shabby and old-fashioned, almost the old scary witch-like lady on the block. With all that plastic surgeries (yeah, yeah, give me a break, can't hide no more), What's really going on with her life -- her morphs are extreme worse.