 |
| OSCARS 2011: Shorty attended the big night as the dutiful husband. This time the two were composed, and did not stare into each others eyes lovingly. Thank you for that Mr and Mrs Kurban. |
Some would say Kidman didn't even deserve to be nominated, but that's the way campaigns go. Money speaks volumes. We're not saying Natalie Portman should have won either, but ALOT of money was spent on the Black Swan Oscar campaign. To be honest, Black Swan is an over-rated film and one that will not be added to this DVD library anytime soon.
Back to Nicole. What is next for a lady so desperate for attention? Do you think she will be satisfied to sit at home and play Mum to new baby Faith Margaret? Think again, folks.
Nicole is due to 'perform' in the Broadway version of "Sweet Old Bird of Youth", this year alongside the delicious James Franco Not sure if it is a wise career choice for Franco to be connected with Kidman, but stranger things have happened. Kidman also has MORE film premieres to attend with the release of the thriller Trespass with Nicolas Cage. She likes the red carpet treatment.
So there you have it. The darling Oscars are over for another year. Do you think Natalie Portman deserved to win the best actress Oscar? Our vote actually went to Annette Benning, in case you were wondering.
63 comments:
It was so sickening to see her face...which had been so played out for over a decade with her severe experimentations to it...a sheer hard watch to see how her FACE appeared. It's ALWAYS about her face, her face, her face...and oddly understated boyish figure. THAT's all there is left of her legacy as a celebrity, an oldie who can't let go that hoopla surrounding looks of young, nubile starlets...looks, looks, looks, face, face, face. Seeing her FACE with those of all other actresses, in her FACE, just saw a time-frozen mannequin however it supposed to have been improved lately...a renovated face, face, FACE....UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am sick of this cow, so glad she didn't win! Now let's hope this is the last Oscars this old tart turns up at. And that little oompa loompa she calls a husband.
HOLLYWOOD's JOKE COUPLE, RIGHT?
Clearly, ANY slowdown in her career...and certainly the quality of her roles...a bit part in the sandler yuckfest...the upcoming film with the money strapped cage...is due to her recent past failed career choices and performances. It HAS NOTHING to do with her PR babies. As recent photos posted at UM of her PR babies at the park...with the nannies...kidman no doubt again will clearly play the role of "absent parent" in the lives of those kids.
What was up with that dress? I guess she needed something to take the attention away from the creepiness of her face, and the child-like demeanor of her husband/employee.
Choice, think NK has already reported for work on her HBO film which I read began shooting today and will take about three months to complete. Broadway is in the fall (end of the year). So the question is, did she get any film offers after promoting herself for five months this awards season? Or will she actually have time to be a mother between the HBO film and Broadway (because she has nothing else to do)??
WOW. People you need to chill out. Totally crazy... Why do you hate her so much, for crying out loud? No one's making you look at her. Don't get the profound hate.
I agreed with the choice of it being Natalie Portman, thought it would have been nice if Bening won - she has been consistently good as an actress and gathered 4 nominations. She needs one...hope she gets it.
Oh please Choice, call her Mrs. Urban. I hear she hates that!!
Anon 2:03pm Who said anything about hating Kidman? We can just see right through her. Obviously you cannot see through the charades and lies. Wake up to yourself.
If you think anyone beleives you don't hate Kidman, you are dumber than you appear and for the record, your constant obsession over her every move, reeks of borderline personality/psychological disorder. And no, I'm not her dad, nor am I a 'fan'.
She's doing "Sweet Bird of Youth" not Streetcar; she'll play the role of a fading actress who keeps the company of alcohol, drugs and gigolos.
"your constant obsession over her every move, reeks of borderline personality/psychological disorder."
Ha! Here we are! SO..."non-fansie"...tell us all...how did that blogsite go for you all? So how many "skeptics" did you report to mutt and jeff's attorneys...and how many got "investigated" and "prosecuted" for slander and defamation? All those skeptics got truly shut down eh?
Yes, Choice...those loser blogsite failure fansies are slowly making there way back onto your site. But then...where else can they go. right?!
Maclen - We get several comments from fansies every week which are just too rude to publish. That one you commented on was hilarious so we thought it deserved being published.
But they are wrong - we are not borderline personality psychological disorder! We are well truly crazy - we crossed that border ages ago. Yes indeed to the fansies, this nuthouse is happy to bring you this Blog every week! At least we don't lie like your precious princess (who feeds bullshit week in, week out)
Cheers
The Funny Farm
Well, clearly Choice, the state of the "fansie brigade" is on par with kidman's career. Just for laughs I just checked the last bastion of kidman komments over at the E! boards...the "keith urban: the postive
thread"...http://boards.eonline.com/Insider/Boards/thread.jspa?messageID=3062912#3062912
...and in the past 10 days...since feb 20...there has been only a total of 7 comments. And...all by one lonely commentor...simply posting pics and links to articles. There is basically NO ONE left on the kidman side...who is interested in any longer commententing on kidman's failed career. If that doesnt tell you how it's going for kidman...nothing will!
Maclen - are you trying to say we are not the only ones in the world who can't stand these two idiots? The fansies who attack this blog won't agree with you LOL
PS. long live Kurbans ... not
IF YOU HATE HER SO MUCH WHY DO U WRITE THIS BAD TASTE BLOG. I HAVE REPORTED IT TO GOOGLE AS EXTREMELY INSULTING!!!! Keith is a nice guy, he was lost until he found her, and she saved him from a potential overdose. You should be grateful to her, one fantastic nice lady. WHY DON"T YOU AND THE OTHER WANKERS ON HERE FAAAARK OFF - NOW! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!! LEAVE HER ALONE. MACLEAN CAN GET LOST TOO (he secretly loves her, right???????)
My favourite actress
Ha Ha...your right Choice, the whackos ARE hilarious! The previous comment from "Charlie Sheen" had me on the floor! Hey...maybe kidman should hook up with sheen...she can no doubt "save him!"
Clearly, the fansies are scattering like mice...from an obviously rancid piece of smelly cheese that is the careers of mutt and jeff.
I too have reported this Blog and also the one called Urban Myths and there is another one too which is shit too. Hopefully you will all be closed.
Nicole is a superstar, you people are nothing more than idiots.
PISS OFF WRITERS OF THIS BLOG and Anonymous March 3 9:16 AM
I hate to burst your bubble, but many, many threats have been made about reporting this blog, the UM blog, the E board, and any and all places where negative things are said about KUNK, BUT NO ONE CARES! Ask the fanatic who defended KUNK with everything she could on here and was going to report this blog. Choice, how long ago was that threat? Choice is still here! The fanatic ran away and is pouting somewhere. Why are these sites still existing after so many attempts at shutting them down? Because opinions, comments and thoughts are being shared. That is not illegal. Keep making a fool out of yourselves - it gives us a laugh!
Go back to Monkeyville, continue making your little arts and crafts for Keith, and keep praying that some day you will get near the stage on your fan club pre-sales.
"YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!" What the hell is that supposed to mean? Karma, people, Karma! No Meet & Greet for you!
To the fans, you can't defend your favorite celebrities so you attack those who disagree with you? Is that how it works? Last I heard there was free speech in this country. Think Google gets that. How come you don't? If your so insulted by the comments, don't read them. Seems pretty simple.
All this talk about the return of her face, if you look at it, it's completely static, a mask made to resemble what she looked like before all that facial experimentations...all so creepy to me...call that a return, it's twilight zone...where have her brains been since the divorce? She's truly, truly CREEPY-LOOKING...
BLUE SKY:
I and others have reported this and UM Blog to Google and they are currently looking into it. Go to hell, you have no idea what we are capable of. Kidman is also aware of these blogs, make no mistake.
People take note:
Feel free to try and shut us down. However ... we will just re-open on another blogger site not long after. You can't keep a good blog down.
Alternatively you could just not visit this blog if it offends you. Obviously some of you cannot resist the urge to see what we think of your Botox Queen.
Clearly, the "wandering" fansies do not have the will...or the fortitude to keep their fawning blogs going in defense of mutt and jeff...but their bitterness STILL keeps them coming back to the "successful" blogs to whine and complain. As I mentioned...the last bastion for fansie support at the E! boards, the orb "positive" thread...is obviously on it's last legs. Meanwhile the orb "negative" thread is still going strong. They are simply a nuisance...much like kidman and orb.
I agree, if people cannot handle the truth about this fake lying crow, then why visit this Blog. It seems they get furious if anyone has a different opinion. Or they are jsut getting frustrated that their fan base is dwindling.
Folks - the US box office stats do not lie. Her rabbit movie only made about $2million. Is that pathetic or what? Keith's new album has been a total flop too.
Just ask Mr Mclean for the stats.
BLUE SKY:
I and others have reported this and UM Blog to Google and they are currently looking into it. Go to hell, you have no idea what we are capable of. Kidman is also aware of these blogs, make no mistake.
Yes, sure they are currently looking into it (wink-wink). Such a liar as Google does not respond back that quickly! Again, attempts have been made, but the blog still remains, thanks to Choice!
"Go to hell"? What would your Catholic Faith practicing idol say if she found out her fans are telling people to go to Hell?
Kidman is aware of this blog? FANTASTIC! Well, here are my opinions in case she is reading tonight - not a good actress, she destroyed her face with all her "natural" procedures to it, and a horrible mother. (I'm Isabella and Connor would back me on that.) I mean what multi-millionaire times two has to return to work after two months after having another woman deliver her baby? She bailed out of The Reader the last minute - why not this movie for the sake of her outside child?
KUNK has nothing but delusional trash for fans!
The box office poison that she is, the vehicle she chooses for a comeback once again plays a no- character ranting in essence a bimbo and forget box office results again (her tiny brain can only focus on herself.) Wow, the gamble did not pay off, she without an award and the film only grossing $2M. This is what happens when one's mentally severely limited and don't know it; sycophants around you won't tell you the truth -- that you're really a moron. (Guessed her performance or what resembles acting before the rabbithole - that she'll rant throught that movie, and she did.) she continues to do this because in hours she got an award for that, and her pea brains continues to deliver what she thinks public want to see, hear & judge (as opposed to genuine original thoughts -- several other bloggers had noted this & already mentioned...has not an iota of originality) Giving her an award for playing a ranting, rambling "pathetic, vapid" virginia wolf was a HUGE MISTAKE - we'll continue to see this in her more "non-frivolous" films. Since she can't portray a character...remember as far back as the portraits of lady, cold mountain, etc. --- ALL throaty ranting bimbo's), will guess here that's how she'll play Gellhorn AND, her movies will continue to bomb again and again and again...as long as she's footing the bills to be perceived still in demand!
I agree with Laura. Her Rabbit hole movie has only made $2m at the Box Office. That is REALLY REALLY bad considering how long it has been out now. That could mean (please select your favourite reason):
a) No-one wants to see Kidman on screen
b) Kidman can't act, so why pay to see that?
c) Aaron Eckhart can't pull a movie
d) Kidman looks like Rennee Zelweger when she is yelling at her husband - and it is putting people off
e) All of the above
Laura said...
"Folks - the US box office stats do not lie. Her rabbit movie only made about $2million. Is that pathetic or what? Keith's new album has been a total flop too.
Just ask Mr Mclean for the stats."
Yep, Laura...kidman's box office failure has been fully documented. And a look at her current co stars film credits... as I just posted over at UM...
http://boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/?id=cliveowen.htm
...clive owen's recent record of mediocre box office clearly shows why he's also reduced to settling for a tv film...as is "box office poison" kidman.
Under the "Can't she ever learn to shut her mouth?" category we have these latest gems:
1. Apparently, Sunday has anointed herself "mummy's little cub," which, while a rather strange thing for a 2 1/2 year old to say, is oh-so-helpful because
2. Kidman fancies herself a lioness, and so in response
3. Keith has informed her that she's like "a raw egg" due to her extreme "sensitivity."
I shit you not.
PS: "A raw egg"? Does that mean her brains are scrambled?
what a dreadful picutre you've chosen to represent Rabbit Hole. shouldnt you include it in your timeline under 2010.
e
and I am not an idiot.
Do other people think it is weird that a movie nominated for an Oscar can't even generate interest with people who go to the cinema? She really has put people off, hasnt she!
My god ... 2 million dollars is crap. has not even made back what it took to make (5 mill).
Shocking to be honest.
Anonymous 1:58,
In the Nashville Scene interview that's now out, Kidman repeats what she's said in the past: she wants to produce movies that nurture artistic talent (so far so good), but she's uninterested in any monetary concerns. She doesn't want to be involved with a blockbuster because that's just business.
God forbid she should prove herself a moneymaker for her studio and distributor. That simply would be too crass for words. No, it's best to remain sniffy and elitist about money. Worrying about the bottom line is for plebians.
(Funny how her husband doesn't mind making commercial decisions, but that's another story.)
She always has been ridiculously cavalier with other people's money. She came from comfortable circumstances, made a bundle in her divorce settlement, and now lives with yet another wealthy man who can indulge her.
At this point, the amount of investment she's put into Blossom Films is probably minimal. Truth be told, she has at best a skeleton staff. Until such time comes where she invests HER OWN MONEY, she'll remain a limited businesswoman...and a spoiled brat.
A440,"...she wants to produce movies that nurture artistic talent (so far so good), but she's uninterested in any monetary concerns. She doesn't want to be involved with a blockbuster because that's just business." If true, she's just plain stupid. She's in entertainment, an entertainer to entertain people. Her continued measly interest by people in her craft and products she stars in/produces if you could call it that on a commercial scale had been dismal failures. There is ample merit in good quality and entertainment films and making them on blockbuster scale is extremely difficult, it's tapped into masses' interest and entertainment quality. Who's she fooling, she can't do it as an actress or produce products that people are willing to pay to see. It's as simple as that. If this is a hobby of sorts for her, which is another cop out way of dismissing her own performance, she should get out of the business.
How does an actress get nominated for a best actress Oscar when the film she was in only makes $2 million? How can the general public, and even those in Hollywood, agree that her performance is worth an Oscar when 99% haven't even seen the movie and her performance - much less even knew that the movie existed? Obviously, her performance wasn't noteworthy enough to bring the crowds to the theater.
3. Keith has informed her that she's like "a raw egg" due to her extreme "sensitivity."
LOL! that is so funny. I don't think I'd tell that story about myself.....it's not exactly a compliment, is it? She's so sensitive that being around her is like walking on eggshells is what it brings to mind.
A440 wrote "...and now lives with yet another wealthy man who can indulge her." That's not what's been reported in other blog sites, like UM. Sounds like a legal relationship where she has to foot the bills to get her ways with her career (the lack of offers, stay with the roles she can get after a series of cancellations, particularly in first half of this decade, being a "box office poison"), man (get him to do what she wants...even seems to be requiring sacrificing his career and manhood, her desire to be a PR mom...setting him up with a music label co she created, etc.)...there are overwhelming facts about HER SURVIVAL SPENDING...can't deny his less than enthusiasm displayed for offsprings he has to call his...seen his pictures lately with her, like walking several paces behind, labeling her a "raw egg" (extreme sensitivities), divorce settlement that includes HER settlement to him based on the length of their marriage, etc. ...doesn't sound like a pampered, financially or otherwise person with not a care in the world...anyway, she got that foremost thing she will always have to deal with and only gets worse - GETTING OLD and PHYSICALLY UGLY.
Anonymous 8:39,
Well, consider it this way,
With Keith being deep into 60s muscle cars, did he buy the Bentley ("It was not cheap!") for his pleasure or hers?
Do you think he has high-end properties in LA and NYC for his pleasure or hers?
I don't know which sites you're tapping into and what they're saying, but I have no doubt that at her demand, he coddles her. Yes, this is a financial arrangement, any marriage with this amount of money in play would have to be on some level. (There's been some chatter that she's now the owner of HIS publishing rights.)
But there can be no doubt that Keith is making big-time purchases simply to please his high-maintenance wife. He alluded to that just a few days ago when he said in an interview that after all this time, he's STILL trying to impress her. He is her cash cow; the same as it was with Tom.
I'm tickled pink that he put his foot down about keeping Nashville as their base...'cause you know she's GOT to hate it there. It's too small and provincial a town for a woman who openly prefers NYC. At least he won THAT fight.
A440 - good points! Have often doubted her words that she loves living in Nashville. Kidman claims it gives her the quiet life she desires but I think she would snap at the chance to live in New York or LA where she has some friends left.
blue sky,
To be considered for an Oscar, all you have to do is show your film in NYC and/or LA by a specific cut-off date. If you do that, consider yourself in the running.
The fact that the rest of America has been overlooked is irrelevant. You're now eligible.
Hi, Choice,
Just saw your entry, so thanks!
Yeah, Kidman has made it clear that she much prefers NYC when in the States, not only in terms of friends there (Jackman comes to mind), but in terms of what's available culturally and how actually NYC is easier paps-wise. Apparently, while omni-present, they're not nearly as aggressive.
So, don't buy into her clap-trap about how she nearly purchased property in Washington State 'cause she fell in love with the space and small-town freedoms. And how she just ADORES homey, cozy, rural Nashville.
If she and Keith were to split, she'd be out of there in a heartbeat.
One last bit to note and I promise to quit typing!
Notice how the tables have turned financially since they married. When they worked out the pre-nup (and the alleged "contract"), Kidman was the big money-maker.
Now Keith is making noticeably more than she is. I don't know what her portfolio is worth overall and if she's worth more than Keith.
But certainly his current income streams are producing more than hers right now. That's been confirmed by Forbes Magazine. So, right now, he's the family rainmaker.
It's Simpson-Lachey all over again.
A440 - you seem to think you know it all but you don't OK ????
You are incorrect. For a film to be considered for an Oscar it needs to the shown at lead up festivals (eg. Toronto film festival) and then purchased by a distributor. Without a distributor, like Lionsgate, the Academy won't even bother looking at it. You crap on about NYC but that's utter rubbish. Get your facts straight. A film needs exposure and then snapped up by a distributor to stand a chance. Rabbit Hole got both those things.
WHEN U GONNA LEARN THAT KIDMAN WAS GOOD IN RABBIT HOLE! HAVE U EVEN SEE IT MR KNOW IT ALL ?
Anon 12:02 am wrote "WHEN U GONNA LEARN THAT KIDMAN WAS GOOD IN RABBIT HOLE!" yet you chide another blogger as "know-it-all", c'mon..... I live in a huge city, USA, near like 22+ cinemaplex theater, not once her film was shown...yeah was on a lookout for rh. Okay, don't know how it works but clearly her movie may have finally got a distributor but couldn't get the theater owners to buy it. They too got to worry about the bottom line (that's profit/revenue), why pay for and waste a theater on a film that's going to attract only a handful audience when another film would fill it up. It appears her film moved from select theater viewing to none. Yeah how can the performance of an actress in such a film be considered award-worthy, when it attracted, effectively, zero audience
Anon 1:38 has god very good points! How can they call a film award worthy when the actress can't fill a cinema! That is the real reason many cinemas across USA decided not to take it up, because her name is too risky. When you have nearly ten years of flops behind you, no one wants to touch it.
Let's not forget the dreadful acting in Australia. Amazing they nominated her after that shocker.
Anonymous said...
"A440 - you seem to think you know it all but you don't OK ????
You are incorrect. For a film to be considered for an Oscar it needs to the shown at lead up festivals (eg. Toronto film festival) and then purchased by a distributor. Without a distributor, like Lionsgate, the Academy won't even bother looking at it."
Ok, so once again it's "Let dispell the asinine rubbish from a clueless fansie" time again. According to wiki...to qualify for an oscar nom...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award
"Currently, according to Rules 2 and 3 of the official Academy Awards Rules, a film must open in the previous calendar year, from midnight at the start of January 1 to midnight at the end of December 31, in Los Angeles County, California, to qualify (except for the Best Foreign Language Film).[24] For example, the 2010 Best Picture winner, The Hurt Locker, was actually first released in 2008, but did not qualify for the 2009 awards as it did not play its Oscar-qualifying run in Los Angeles until mid-2009, thus qualifying for the 2010 awards.
Rule 2 states that a film must be feature-length, defined as a minimum of 40 minutes, except for short subject awards, and it must exist either on a 35 mm or 70 mm film print or in 24 frame/s or 48 frame/s progressive scan digital cinema format with native resolution not less than 1280x720."
...and nowhere in the rest of the rules section does it mention "festivals' or "distributor." Boy, what a simple google search would do for these silly and very vapid fansies! It would seem that A440 simply had the "NYC" part incorrect...BUT this fansie has EVERYTHING incorrect! Before you open your useless gob...perhaps...YOU SHOULD CHECK YOUR FACTS. Hey, I wonder if I'm replying to charlie sheen?!
Anon 12:02,
You dropped the ball. I wasn't talking about a film's odds. I was referring to actual Academy rules.
There is no requirement concerning film festival showings.
There is no requirement concerning distributors.
There is a 7-day exhibition in Los Angeles County rule (NYC was not mentioned--my mistake).
There are several other rules concerning promo and admission monies and format, etc., but NOTHING of what you mentioned.
And, you also managed to get my sex wrong. No one has ever done THAT before.
This tranny and michael jackson have a lot in common, not just in terms of their weird looks (both in kabuki masks and all), have bizarre outlook of life and mother nature, real creeps... mj acted like an european royalty (like walking into an upscale antique shop and what one would expect an arab price to clean up whatever took his fancy, I want that one, that one, etc.) yet in reality, he was dead broke, that shop owner says most went unpaid & mj was eating for meals taco bell tacos. HER,she continues to act like herself at the peak of her career almost a decade ago at award shows and other red carpet events when she clearly is a footnote to other hot actors and celebrities. at least paltrow talks to her I guess, but then again it's paltrow
Maybe people on the positive thread haven't been posting because they have a life.
The reason why the negative thread is still going is because the same small group of sick people who post here and UMyths every single day, post there every single day too. How many places do you need to say the same things? If you're trying to sound like the majority, you're failing miserably. You're the same group of fat ex-Keith fanatics who hate Nicole Kidman because she's someone you'll never be and has someone you'll never get. You reek of rage and jealously. Normal people don't google people they dislike 10 times a day just to get a jump on the comment board.
Maybe someday you'll step back and realize how pathetic you've been and how much time you've wasted. Someday when you, your husband, your parent or your child is laying on a death bed, you might want the 6 years you spent stalking 2 celebrities back. In the meantime, keep dreaming.
Holly says: "You're the same group of fat ex-Keith fanatics who hate Nicole Kidman because she's someone you'll never be and has someone you'll never get...Someday when you, your husband, your parent or your child is laying on a death bed, you might want the 6 years you spent stalking..." blah, blah, blah, boy, this weirdo is a misogynist. or catty, catty, go f-ck a duck, WEIRDO! (or yeah, wait a minute, a WEIRDO, you're NK??????????) hahahahahahahahahahah
Holly: if you have a life as you claim, why do you spend time looking at the 'negative' boards. Who are you to even say this Blog is negative? Just because it does not agree with your opinion of Oompa Loompa and his tall streak of misery wife, is no reason to be rude to us.
Now ... go back to your life of tucking your kids into bed instead of searching for 'negative' blogs on your heroes. You hypocritical bitch.
"hypocritical bitch."
BAHAHAHA! That's funny coming from a bunch of toads who say Keith and Nicole are boring but still stalk and analyze their every move 24/7.
They probably stopped posting on the positive thread because they don't have to prove how stupid and insane the haters are with Oh So Leery around. Or what big liars they are.
Hey, Oh Leery! Did your family really live in Cool Springs and then move to Franklin? Are you sure they didn't live in Rivergate and move to Hendersonville? Or maybe they lived in Hickory Hollow and moved to Antioch. BAHAHAHAHA!
You're the same group of fat ex-Keith fanatics who hate Nicole Kidman because she's someone you'll never be and has someone you'll never get.
I hope to hell I'm NEVER like Kidman. I enjoy taking care of my kids and seeing them everyday. I would never turn my kids over to a cult to keep rumors about my past from hitting the media.
As far as never getting Keith, I prefer a husband who isn't addicted to hard-core drugs as well as hard-core porn stars! Once your spouse cheats on you, you will always have trust issues. Imagine how really hard you have to work on this marriage to keep it going?
You apparently keep stalking us, so you have no life either!
Yeah....well...so I guess I should contribute something to this, huh? Well, I would just recommend everyone go check out this hilarious "farewell blog" entry...laughibly explaining why they are "tuck tailing...and running away" from the defense of their precious mutt and jeff...
http://skeweringtheskeptics.blogspot.com/2010/12/so-long-farewell.html#comments
...well, you gotta admit...their job was such a resounding success...they really shut us all up, huh. But, if you really want a HUGE laugh...read the comments....ALL 5 OF THEM! Well, only 4 really...as the now failed blogger owner of the site themselves made a comment. So I guess they all did move on with their lives...yes, they probably just switched over to beiber...or taylor swift...no doubt they need the the satisfaction of having successful celebs to fawn over! But again, when they model their own "ineptness" with that of team kidman's...they cant help but fail to be anything but pointless!
All good points Maclen.
And whatever happened to NK United? I believe that shut down, correct?
Choice said...
"All good points Maclen.
And whatever happened to NK United? I believe that shut down, correct?"
Ha! Yes... the NK useless? Seems last I recall the site owner stopped updating...basically shut it down...but apparently left the forum open for the stragglers posting latest news and "congrats" Now this is interesting...
http://www.nicolekidmanunited.invisionzone.com/
...it seems the site has been "attacked"...
"****PLEASE NOTE - THE BOARD IS TEMPORARILY CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC DUE TO HACKING ATTEMPTS BEING INVESTIGATED.***"
...yeah...they are under "attack" from those mean ol' skeptics. Yeah, I'm sure the "investigation" will shut down all criticism of their pathetic kidman!
from an outback scrag to a botoxed $LUT, Freeze Granny Freeze!
Maclen - it's hilarious how NKU shut down and then they use the excuse that hackers or whatever are ruining it. Sounds more like the webmaster realised that Kidman's career was down the toilet so figured it was best to quit but make it look like they had no choice. Classic.
The fanatics can keep sending me your awful messages. They will moderated, only the crudest will be published LOL.
I think Kidman should quit all future projects and come and work with me on my home based Web show. We need a few more looneys to make it more attractive. It dropped to 50,000 viewers yesterday - shit!
Nicole, you can bring your ex, Tom, with you if you like. He's the biggest looney of them all!
Hope to hear from you soon Nicole!
Cheers, Charlie
A message from "Charlie Sheen" to Nicole! How perfect is that!
From Mr. Tiger Blood himself to our resident "lioness"!
You know, I love how these things work out...
Changing subject...just noticed her mint bikini picture under "she felt so much love for the surrogate" - she does look tranny, her posture too is manly, what's with her tummy for such a skeletal or anoerexic person...when it comes to looks she sure is full of mysteries....
Choice, it has been ten days since "threats" have been made to "shut 'er down". Any word from the administrators of Google yet? I haven't heard that they changed laws that you couldn't give your unfavorable opinions about Nicole Kidman the superstar yet.
(I'm really LOL while I typed this!)
Post a Comment