"Meow! Hand me that whip Tom, then bend over!"
'Mundane' to 'strange sexual fetish stuff' is how Nicole Kidman has described her experience of marriage to GQ Magazine (British edition) - which hits the stands this Thursday.
Nicole explained "I've explored obsession. I've explored loss and love in terms of being in a grief-stricken place, I've explored strange sexual fetish stuff and the mundane aspect of marriage."
Nicole once again took the chance to remind us all that she was married to TOM CRUISE. She said: "I became famous very young. I became very famous because I was the wife of somebody. I know my agents at the time were like 'do not get married, it will ruin your career' and I was like 'but I'm in love'. All I know is that I was someone who wasn't interested in fame. And that's not why I got married. I wanted to work with people who intrigued me."
Nicole also revealed in the interview that she burns all her diaries, so none of the juicy stuff will ever be revealed. For example - who is the real mother of Sunday. Or how many men did Tom have sex with during their marriage. Jeez, fancy writing all these diaries, just to burn them! Sounds like another boring Kidman interview - agree? Not interested in fame? Ha! Pigs may fly.
18 comments:
I agree - another dull Nicole interview, where she pretty much says the same stuff over and over. I bet the Church of Scientology have her over a barrel - that is why she is scared of saying anything juicy about Tom. Tom would have her crucified.
How freaking predictable and insulting to our collective intelligence. EVERY TIME she has a new movie come out she manages an interview where she gives a (supposedly) juicy titbit about her private life. And this one takes the cake! I bet she and Tommy boy did it one night with the lights on while he was wearing his platforms and to her that constitutes 'strange fetish stuff'.
I've read more of this interview and it is absolutely nauseating how she pontificates about her 'raw' and 'dangerous' marriage to Urban. Please, is Nicole trying to convince everyone she's deep and complicated? To me she's about as substantial as fairy bread.
Oh, and that picture clearly highlights her totally natural breast implants.
I cannot for the life of me believe a woman of her age can appear looking like this. What will her daughter think in years to come? "Oh my mother was a slutty transvestite?"
Her marriage to Urban is raw and dangerous alright. She only gets attention by appearing in the raw and when she runs her mouth, it's dangerous cause people could find out the truth about it! LOL
Yes, another PR BS cover story of the same old stuff...cruise...lost love...she was "grief stricken! and unfortunately...and ineptly...after publically testifying in congress, Miss Ambassador "Hollywood demeans woman...but I dont!" kidman wantonly poses and talks as Kinky winky so rightly describes..."a slutty transvestite" Well the previous "senstational" Vanity Fair interview didnt help her dead career, this will only show her for the hypocritical hack she truly is!
How bizarre! One minute she's critising Hollywood for objectifying women as sex objects and the next she's turning up for a shoot in her underwear! Me thinks she's getting a tad desperate for attention.
Poor Nicole Kidman. With the work that she's had recently done she rapidly become another over-the-hill movie star displaying signs of a desperate mid-life crisis. A sad display, indeed.
Also another interesting "rumor" that also came out late last night... after the "Kinky kidman" article hit the nets...right on its heels a story came out reporting that kidman was set to star in this film...
http://www.screendaily.com/festivals/afm/pattinson-kidman-board-bel-ami-for-protagonist/5007648.article
"In an intriguing star pairing, Twilight sensation Robert Pattinson is teaming with Nicole Kidman to star in Bel Ami, the film of Guy De Maupassant’s erotically charged story of ambition, power and seduction."
...right...inept team kidman is really shoveling it now...kinky...erotically charged...seduction! But wait! What about the sex change movie... the "madame to the stars" heidi fleiss flick with kidman's name attached again was on the news nets last week I noticed! Are any of these story true? Probably not, but the whole point seems to be that team inept kidman wants to give an impression...that kidman is one bizzare "super sex freak!"
She always talks about herself and her life's survival/lessons forever. God, it's truly sickening for a middle-aged person, this lady's really peculiar like her appearance had evolved/morphed.... Also, this strategy is a--backwards. YOu were supposed to vamp in your 20's & possibly early 30's; not in 40's! (cover yourself up and all your mighty old biddy self.) You had spent that time playing Snow White, and you had missed that age group vamping forever....
Anonymous said...
"YOu were supposed to vamp in your 20's & possibly early 30's; not in 40's! (cover yourself up and all your mighty old biddy self.) You had spent that time playing Snow White, and you had missed that age group vamping forever...."
Yes, interesting comment anon...I myself of course see kidman as trying to "do" jolie...kidman obviously wants jolie's lips...now she wants to be portrayed, as you mention anon,...the "vamp"... But hilariously she actually reminds me more of megan fox...a pale(pun on kidman intended!)...imitation of ridiculous proportions!
Guys - be grateful she has dyed her hair back to red. See she does listen occassionally. She may look like a tramp in this photo, but at least the red hair is back ...
WIth each day, there is fresh hope for this old has-been.
God only knows whose hair that is. It sure isn't hers!
Isn't she around the age now where people pay her to keep her clothes on??? Isn't the real target market for entertainers is ages 18 to 35 or thereabouts? If you're in that bracket and seeing 40-something T&Aing...forget cougars, like maclen said, "HILARIOUS." Not quite the reaction she's going for. How about you(nicole) really re-examine your motives...
This has to be a joke! One minute she is telling people that we must stop violence against women. Now she looks like she is trying to say ' get kinky mad with women, we love it'. She has ALWAYS been a hypocrite and one of the most overpaid useless actors in this world. Seriously if she was starting out now, no-one would give her a second glance. This mutton still claims she married Tom because she loved him. BULLSHIT! It was a chance to make it big, and she took it. No-one believes a word this tramp says anymore. Why cant she just retire, LIKE SHE PROMISED! WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE HER A WALKING FRAME AS A HINT ???
"All I know is that I was someone who wasn't interested in fame."
And that's why she's chosen to be on the cover of a magazine in her underwear?
You gotta love these airheaded celebrities!
ANON 8:03pm 6/11/09
SPOT ON! She is not interested in fame, but happy to be on a mag cover dressed as a tramp. She'd say that her interest in fame was back then, not now. Let's all remember Nic dropped out of school, aged 15. She doesn't have the smarts to conduct herself properly in an interview. Her parents are probably very embarrassed right now.
She looks...TERRIBLE on that cover!! If she's trying to look like she's smiling seductively,she's not doing it very well...
She must have had one of those portable Instant-Botox-Syringes she so often carries around...
It's nice to know that we don't have to see Meryl Streep in a G-string or Cate Blanchett in a bikini on the cover of a magazine because those women can be attract attention, admiration and respect for their incredible acting abilities alone.
I agree with you Laura. You would never see Cate of Meryl dressing like a tramp. What was Nicole thinking? Has she lost the plot for good?
Post a Comment