Sunday, March 13, 2011

Nicole's agenda for the rest of 2011

TOP: Kidman and Owen in character in Hemingway and Gellhorn - currently in production
BOTTOM: The real Hemingway and Gellhorn
Did you really believe Nicole Kidman when she said she was going to take time off when the new baby arrived? Come now, be sensible! The woman is known for lying, so why would you think she'd rather be at home with Faith (and Sunday for that matter) when it interferes with her fame whore ways?


We've been given access to Kidman's Agenda for the rest of the year, and we'd like to share it with you. Apparently it is in order of priority. No surprises though:
  1. Work
  2. Botox Appointment
  3. Work
  4. Work
  5. Botox Top Up
  6. Work
  7. Surgical enhancements
  8. Work
  9. Spend some time with Faith Margaret
  10. Catch up with Sunday Rose, and Keith
Currently, Kidman is filming Hemingway and Gellhorn with Clive Owen. This is a HBO movie, and Nicole plays Ernest Hemingway's third wife, war correspondent Martha Gellhorn.  Following that, Kidman goes into rehearsals for the Broadway play Sweet Old Bird of Youth, alongside James Franco. If you are wondering who will be playing the old bird, you have one guess! 
This year will also include Nicole's favourite thing of all: Red carpet events where she can play up to the Paparazzi, and drink glasses of wine (remember she doesn't drink). Nicole will be promoting her new film Trespass with co-star Nicolas Cage. There is also the rumoured production of The Danish Girl - the film that was going to be filmed two years ago but there were ongoing issues with obtaining a co-star. 


Further down on the Agenda, it appears that Kidman will finally get to spend some time with the baby they desperately wanted.  Now, who said these lovely words about having children:


"Children are children - you'll die for your children. When you feel that as parent, that's unconditional love."


Deep and meaningful words spoken by a completely devoted mother. What a gal! 


For a brand new father, Keith has a very busy year ahead, touring most of the year to promote his new album Get Closer.  These two must REALLY need the money. Sickening ...

31 comments:

Laura said...

I reckon Nicole craves attention badly. She'd claim that she has the acting itch and needs to perform. If acting is what you call it. I think the HBO film might be moderately interesting, Trespass will be boring and the Broadway play we can do without.
Something VERY weird about her need to be relevant.

katieblack said...

Do you suppose the Danish girl will require someone to actually lock lips with it? Would there be scenes that would have this co-star (please forgive me for this image) sleeping with it?

There's your trouble.

Anonymous said...

First of all Nicole really likes the word "desparately". What I don't get is, if she was so DESPARATE to have Sunday and now Faith, why doesn't she spend more time with them. If someone is desparate for something and finally gets it you would think everything else would take second place. This woman is so self-centered it just disgusts me. I don't think she even realizes how stupid she sounds most of the time.

G.W. said...

How do you know that she is not taking the baby with her on her work assignments. I realise she should stay at home for a year like most mothers do, but she is a sought after actress and if the work is there, what choice does she really have. Her reputation would be at stake if she said no. I bet she would rather be at home with the baby but if the offers are there she has to take them. WOULDNT ANY OF YOU ?

blue sky said...

G.W., you sound like a crazed fan who will find any lame excuse to defend Kidman. Having Kidman's financial lifestyle would be the equivalent of you winning the Powerball lottery. Let's say you won $100 million - would you continue working or be a stay-at-home mom to those two little girls that were miraculously given to you? She could also easily let Keith bring home the bacon with the millions he brings home each year. How much money does she need? Remember it was Kidman who said she would take a break from her career for family. I haven't seen that break yet since Faith has been born.

"Sought after actress" really? Her reputation is box office poison - especially after "Rabbit Hole". It made $2 million, but you will say she got an Oscar nom for it - so what - the movie is a flop - period! How many flops have had their actors nominated for an Oscar?

GW said...

Blue Sky
To you, Rabbit hole may have been a flop, but to me a masterpiece. So what if it only made $2m, it doesn't mean the film itself was bad, it just means narrow minded assholes like you weren't prepared to give her a chance. She is trying really hard to to prove herself as a fine actress after being ridiculed to death by people like yourself. She is a devoted mother, can't you see by the look in her eyes when she carries her baby?

Anonymous said...

The way she looks at her baby. Are you kidding me. You mean the way she looks when the paps get a picture of the child. So she can get her botoxed face on a magazine cover. The movie is and was a flop. Your taste in crappy movies aside. It flopped. She is a mediocre actress. She always has been. And then there is mediocre actress has been.

A440 said...

The only thing she's devoted to is Nicole Kidman.

Sunday was a newborn when Our Nic dragged her onto the Nine set. Where was the stay-at-home mother she swore she'd be?

Now Faith is all of 2 1/2 months old and SHE'S being dragged onto the Hemingway set. Where is the 6-month break Nic swore she'd take?

She stated years ago that when she remarried she wanted to be surrounded by kids on a tropical island "with hair down to my bum," as if THAT was an important factoid to mention.

The gist of it being...she'd retire and focus on a new family.

I see the focus being Nic and her vaunted career.

And here's a newsflash: if Rabbit Hole cost $5 million, and it takes in $2 million, it's a loser for all of her investors. Remember them? Those bean counters she's so contemptuous of?

Not that she put any of HER money in it. That stupid she's not.

Choice said...

A440 - had that same thought the other day. Rabbit Hole cost $5m so has lost money for investors. Kidman wants people to know her very own company produced the film, but you are right, she wouldn't have funded any herself.

I imagine Lionsgate would be pretty mad too for becoming the distributor. Any thoughts on why the Academy liked her performance because it wasn't that outstanding.

blue sky said...

And here's a newsflash: if Rabbit Hole cost $5 million, and it takes in $2 million, it's a loser for all of her investors. Remember them? Those bean counters she's so contemptuous of?

Because of this, no one is seeking her out to be in their movies.

Anonymous said...

Choice wrote: "Any thoughts on why the Academy liked her performance because it wasn't that outstanding."
REALLY. Anyone out there know or make intelligent guess, why the same lot of actors (incl females) get nominated over and over again. julia roberts after erin brokovich supposedly went around saying if she didn't get the Award no one should...and she was nominated and won. Then a slew of actresses in mid 30's - theron, winslet(she's good tho), kidman(Heaven only knows), berry, swank, witherspoon, bullock...they're all similarly packaged or variation of the same theme...IMO...then there ARE other or more talented actrs like laura linley, j moore, who are never under consideration. Is it the talent agency PR & power struggle at play here? In recent years c firth floated around thick, and this year won...also thanked h weinstein for getting the right films to him...SO POLITICAL! SOMEHOW this box office poison tranny cow has apparent connections in the right circle for award taking...how in the HELL her name keeps popping up over other actresses with tons of more talent and in movies that MAKE money. THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WHEN AN ACTOR IN A FILM THAT ONLY GROSSES 2 MILLION IS OSCAR WORTHY (Get your stupid ass name out of this, sure makes the oscar winners laughable)

nancykegley said...

ganKidman is established in the business. She could easily take a year or two off, others do. The problem is, she is no longer in demand so she has to take whatever projects are offered in order to keep her career going. Rabbit Hole was her only film in 09' and she produced it herself. In 2010 she did a bit part in Just Go With It and Trespass for far less money than she was making a couple of years ago. And that was with the help of a new manager hired in January 2010. So far this year she has had no film offers, only the HBO movie, even with all the awards nominations.

Choice, at the time Rabbit Hole was being filmed it was said to have cost $10 million. You can find that on the net. Not good for her investors (or future investors in her production company).

Anonymous said...

Yeah, get to the bottom line about the investors who funded the film this (only) time produced by nk - she's also establishing a track record of not being able to produce a return for them. She'll have an excruciating difficult time producing future films, if any. Again, there is nothing difficult in that business than a project spearheaded by a moron. It should have been clear to a lot of people, she NOT being a draw and that kind of film definitely NOT a crowd pleaser, then shown at the worst possible time of the year (at or post-family, happy time of the year - Xmas, New Year -- who would embrace a film about death in the family from the start of the new year; to get the crowd to go see it, SHE/actress had to be a huge draw, which she/box office poison definitely wasn't) DUH, really don't take much to have forecasted the turnout and return on own's money on this one. Maybe she gave pieces of herself to major investors of that film...seriously, the investors are quite sophisticated, and even a novice could have predicted the financial outcome of that film

Choice said...

Mmmmm, so looks like most of us are in agreement that Rabbit Hole was a flop in along list of flops. You'll have your chance to vote for the best flop.

Mimosa said...

So...GW....apparently there are a lot more "narrow-minded assholes" than sheep-like kidman worshippers. We keep hearing about all her fans, but they don't seem to be inclined to buy movie tickets. Why is that?
Could it be that the majority of the movie going public doesn't like her movies? I think the fact that the movie is a financial failure means there's no interest in kidman, or her very limited abilities onscreen. If people wanted to see her movies...they would.

Maybe we aren't the narrow-minded assholes here.

Anonymous said...

She does make choices for herself that are peculiar to her brains. EVERYTIME celebrities pop babies, moms are beaming and could tell had become baby-centric machines...like what career, I've just got my baby here! Applegate says henceforth her little lady will be making career choices for her, etc. etc. FIRST of ALL, nk has NEVER acted like someone who EVER gave birth to her OWN baby EVER. Press caught her supposedly after giving birth wearing white and going to a coffee shop with her husband. Life for her was as usual, nothing was going to stop her single life...THAT's because she NEVER HAD gone through the gauntlet of childbirth, wealth of experiences, joy of having given birth, yada yada. So THIS time, thinks having gone clean about surrogate mom, YEAH, LIKE SHE HAS EGGS OR CAN PROCREATE, she goes right back to being a single NK...very peculiar this tranny. Not a shred of genuine feel or thought about anything....and...WE'RE supposed to care for this weirdo?

Granny Freeze's wig maker said...

Her days are numbered,because that is a sure sign no one is interested in watching her. A movie makes only $2million despite it being nominated for an Oscar. That nomination still didn't make people want to rush out and see it. People find her a laugh these days after all the surgery etc. No one is forgiving.

Anonymous said...

On her motherhood, one other issue should be mentioned. Most of other baby shots with their moms are about the babies/offsprings. Moms are tending TO them, mom antennas are out TO them, mom comes TO them. They are the centers of moms' attention. THIS TRANNY, have you noticed, are about HER, HER(or HIM) carrying the baby, HER walking with the bay, HER sacking the baby. HER baby is a sack of potatoes, an item for staged shots. Always noticed something not quite right about her mom/offspring shots, not just that they're all so staged-looking, but the center of attention is skewed. THIS weirdo wants the baby/ offspring to come TO her, SHE IS the main theme...UGH, like her face shots, this weirdo is SO SO SICKENING...craves attention badly, it's pathologically so, this guy!

Lilikins said...

Awww. For someone so sure of whats going on in nicole's life, u sure are shitty with facts. First it was streetcar, now sweet 'old' bird of youth? Tsk tsk. So wrong for someone whos supposed to know it all.

Anonymous said...

Bitch needs to get her priorities straight! WHORE

Anonymous said...

Read somewhere (where she and aniston were interviewing each other), get this, THIS aniston IDIOT, LOWER SELF-ESTEEMED FUGLY CRAP said about tranny, "...physically you're a masterpiece...." a masterpiece physically...well, guess that could be of embalming fluid filled manniquin? Yeah, he's sure is a PIECE OF WORK alright

Anonymous said...

Even for this website, that last comment is offensive and if you had any integrity at all you would remove it, no matter how much you despise your obsession. And by the way 'Choice', if I were you, I would be more worried about the example you are setting your children than how much time Kidman does or doesn't spend with hers.

Oh, and I look forward to coming back here in a few days to see that you haven't published my comment as as before.

Choice said...

ANON 8:42pm
You should be grateful I even published your pathetic comment, seeing as you can't even give yourself a name. Biaaarch.

maclen said...

Ha! Yes Choice...it must be rather a tall task for someone to simply come up with a unique "username!" No one defended the "anonymity" of people wanting to post on UM and NK Journey against those psycho "cyberbullies" trying to "out" their true names and address..to and where their kids went to school... to their co-cyberbullies. But these contless "Anonymous" posters...or as I usually refer to them..."a non entity" is rather pathetic. As to the "influence" of Choice's blogsite on kids...choice's only claim of the sites purpose is that "you'll be in stitches keeping up with her antics!". There is NO claim of this site... of raising any viewer's kids properly....that is YOUR hangup. Unlike kidman...who IS out there...constantly shilling how she has a "perfect" family unit now...despite having no contact with her "previous" children...or constantly exploiting her UN work of "working for the dignity and respect of women" all over the world...yet has taken roles that are of women who are disrespected and treated with absolutely no dignity! Fine, she wants to be an "well rounded" actress who will do any role which depicts the "good the bad and the ugly" of society...then dont make a public statement claiming that "OTHERS in lalaland take roles that demean women...but I DONT!"...when it is clearly NOT THE TRUTH! You will be called out on it on blogs like this!

Anonymous said...

God McClen, you like the sound of your own voice don't you? Its a shame you can't string two semi- coherent sentences togetether otherwise your pseudo-intellectual babble might be half interesting. But then I wouldn't expect you to be intelligent given the company you keep..... I wonder if you aren't some jilted ex or envious school buddy of Kidman's, I can't think of any other reason why a sane, mature person would gleefully bitch about someone they don't know they way you do.

Anyhoo, Choice - oh by the way dear, can I look YOU up in the phone book under that name? No, thought not. It really is very easy to manipulate dumb people. I knew you would publish my comment if I challenged you not to and voila, you obliged me. But you did have to think about it for a while didn't you? Lets see if you fall for it again....

Choice said...

Anon 7:39
Don't care what you think, I will publish random letters and even critical ones like yours. If you do not like this Blog, why do you go to the effort to read it. You must have a fascination with Kidman, perhaps a secret lust for her? Otherwise why would you care to visit and defend her. Go create your own Pro Kidman blog.

maclen said...

Anonymous said...
"God McClen, you like the sound of your own voice don't you? Its a shame you can't string two semi- coherent sentences togetether otherwise your pseudo-intellectual babble might be half interesting."

Just a simple clarification, considering your criticizing my "semi-coherent" posts...perhaps you could have managed to spell my username correctly...DUH! WINNING!

Anonymous said...

Isn't this lady weird? Here she got a brand new baby and not one picture crazy focused on it, like all new mothers about their birth and adopted babies, like couldn't get enough, cuddling, showcasing, smiling to it. Guess this lady wants this morsel of flesh to COME TO HER like in the way she demands attention from her other baby. Oh the spotlight cannot be shared, it has to be on her and her only. Bet all her babies grow up inarticulate and void of inner focus because they don't get any in their everyday lives from a weirdo like her who's only interested and maintaining her impression of good life reality...sad for them. This werido should really shove herself up her a** and be done with. NOW DISAPPEAR FOR GOOD.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, all her baby shots are about her walking, hiking, shopping, talking...and oh yeah, taking the baby along like a sack of potatoes. Not her baby walking, wondering, laughing...and oh yeah, her tending to all its whims because it's a baby. Am I alone in this? Her abnormal and contrived baby shots are so telling of their real mother baby relationship (none.) I guess that both babies will grow up like keanu reeves...void of human reactions, expression of inner thoughts, show of understanding of inner weavings of relationships, etc. because growing up, no one had given them enough attention and show of care for what they felt and thought...something like that!

RinaMarie said...

Awww poor Nicole :(

Anonymous said...

REALLY She is RICH. ALl power to her. At least she is not lazy and it is none of anyones business how she lives her life. If you don't like her don't watch her movies.