Ahead of the 'Nine' movie release (apparently now rescheduled to after Christmas), Vogue's November 2009 cover features the leading ladies, including Madame Kidman. Reports have been less than kind for this photoshopped cover, particularly of Nicole's tranny looking facial features. We first mentioned the photo-shoot back in a February post when some reports then were stating that Nicole had returned to the red hair. However, as you can see from the above Vogue cover, it is actually a bad wig. Way too obvious in this photo. Who do they think they are kidding? Click here to see our February 2009 post.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Strike a Pose: Vogue
Ahead of the 'Nine' movie release (apparently now rescheduled to after Christmas), Vogue's November 2009 cover features the leading ladies, including Madame Kidman. Reports have been less than kind for this photoshopped cover, particularly of Nicole's tranny looking facial features. We first mentioned the photo-shoot back in a February post when some reports then were stating that Nicole had returned to the red hair. However, as you can see from the above Vogue cover, it is actually a bad wig. Way too obvious in this photo. Who do they think they are kidding? Click here to see our February 2009 post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
All has-been actresses, especially the one on the far left. That wig would make a good Halloween outfit.
Does her bum look big in that dress?
That's one hell of a bad wig that Nicole is wearing! I've seen Puerto Rican transvestite hookers with better wigs than that! Not a good look for Nicole. She needs to update her statement to: 'I'm completely natural except for the crap wig'.
Is she happy to be an embarrassment at her age? She should have quit after Moulin Rouge (her peak).
I used to like her alot. Now I just see her as a national disgrace. I bet the Vogue edition is a flop!
Just can't be one of other females. Kate Hudson is 5'9", which means not only the Wig but she's (5' 10 1/2?) wearing heels on the beach. I always suspected her magnanomous talent for inappropriate and questionable taste in her appearance that's just not connected to reality...
What pisses me off about that pic is that we are supposed to believe they are all posing together but they clearly aren't. The magazine (or the actresses PR) are so intent on showing each of them at her absolute best they have them inserted individually. Its bullshit and it really lacks integrity - not to mention realism - in my opinion. Aren't these women good looking enough that they can bear up in a candid group photo? Ugh - more bullshit advertising aimed to make normal women feel inaedquate. La Kidman, who claims to be a feminist, should know better.
Frewt
I agree. There's obviously some Diva behaviour going on here. All the others actresses are wearing minimal make-up while Nicole looks like she's got a gig with Cirque du Soleil. It's also interesting, because as a product of the Eighties, Nicole has also resorted to sporting big power hair by wearing a dubious wig. I think what's going on here is that Nicole is saying: 'These chicks are nothing, I am the big Movie Star here!' - but sadly the whole thing has backfired on her and she looks like Ronald McDonald...
Noticed in her more recent movies, she's just unable to share the screen with other females (why her movies had gotten so boring lately...a lot of non-moving, aging facial close-ups) She was effectively alone in Compass, Margot (alternating scenes), Australia (with males only; never once with other actresses)... Here too, her shot was likely doctored while other actresses had gotten together (dressed simlarly.) I wonder if she realizes that she really needs a professional help....
Anon 8:59AM,
She can get professional help from her father. He is supposed to be a well respected pyschologist but with a daughter like this, I have to wonder.
It seems to me if he's a well-respected scientist of any field would have a Ph.D. Then dare to have a high-school drop-out daughter???? Amazing how that was allowed.... Maybe it was preceded by a medical/physical diagnosis of hers as a child, and her parents had gaven up. That part is back now in full force largely due to irreversible and rapidly declining looks. Yeah!
I have to disagree with Deidre. Penelope Cruz is one of the best things in films today, in my humble opinion. She has everything Kidman lacks - sexy earthiness, credibility, likeability, natural beauty. I wonder how intimidated/threatened Kidman feels by Pene given The Poison Dwarf effectively gave her the boot for Ms Cruz? That may explain why they couldn't pose together...
So, Nicole Kidman has had her lips done, she gets botox, she is not natural in anyway. Wow, that puts her in the same group as millions in America and wherever else you want to look but here is one category that she does not fall in, and that is to care that some women or creatures somewhere has the time to spare and focus on her existence and what happens when she passes the women or creatures on the street? she does not even know that they exist and what happens to the women or creatures, they spend days, weeks and months sharing that sighting with everyone they meet and do not meet because they can never do anything else.
As for a post saying that her roles have dried up, you do realise that Kidman is one of the few actresses out there that studios will allow to play the lead role in a movie with a budget of over $100m?
She is weird? weird is great. She is old, everyone gets old but she is not what you are - pathetic and no one wants to be pathetic. Her existence must kill you since you seem to only exist in that cycle of "see a picture, make a nasty comment". Try something new, you know, like travel, helping your community, anything but don't let me stop you. In 10 years, you will still be writing about Nicole Kidman, you are about 4 years in already, she will continue to earn her millions, sit with leaders, exist in that rarefied firmament but you, you will still be here so just for that, I think Kidman wins by more than a mile.
Cheers Anon 7:01am. Always happy for feedback. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. All anyone can ask is for honesty, how about some from Nicole now?
Anon 7.01am
Its just a little heckling, no need to get your knickers in a twist (pun intended) on Nicole's behalf. As you said, she doesn't care and will still go on 'sitting with leaders' (bwahahaha), so why do you?
Here's a thought however, you can only surmise that NK doesn't care what goes on here. One could argue that she certainly does care - she is an insecure actress after all and we know she knows this blog exists.
One thing is absolutely certain however and that is, I don't give a fat rat's patootie what you think about me. And you have THAT from the horse's mouth.
PS 'Millions of Americans' don't lay claim to being serious thespians.
Anon 3:48pm
Good comments. I get the feeling people think that Nicole reads this blog. I would doubt that very much, and is probably unaware it exists. Anon 7:01 probably thinks that by defending her, Nicole will send a personal thank you here. As if! Nicole apparently doesnt even google her own name. And that is only because she doesn't know how to use a computer. She dropped out of school remember?
Truly anon(october 18. 7:01 AM) cough, cough. Nicole exists in that rarified firmament only in your mind. She's been downgraded from New York and LA to Tennessee. Not exactly in the high firmament for A listers. We wouldn't care about her existance at all if she just didn't make herself such an easy mark. The woman is the consumate definition of a Diva. And she wouldn't know natural if it hit her in her botoxed face!
Post a Comment