Nicole escorted Keith to the Granny (Freeze) Awards last night towering over him in her high heels. Nicole wore a long black Prada (yep, she loves her black dresses), and she likes Keith to wear those silver/grey suits. Unfortunately, as we've stated before, Keith is too short and short men don't look good in suits. You'd think at the Grammy Awards, Keith could try to look more the country music artist, say in jeans and a nice t-shirt. Just saying ...Ryan Seacrest gave Keith the chance to clarify some recent comments he'd made about illegal downloading of music. It's a bit late now Keith, backpeddling won't help. We all know what you meant! It will all blow over one day for you, hopefully.
30 comments:
Nicole is wearing her short wig this night - right? My, she is looking plastic again.
Anonymous said...
"Nicole is wearing her short wig this night - right? My, she is looking plastic again."
Most likely, she just isnt wearing her extensions...And of course kidman dressed orb in a "monkey suit". He HAS to be, in her eyes anyway, "presentable" while she is there...there'll be no leather jacket, blue jeans or cowboy boots for orb...you know, like when he showed up decked that way last year at the ARIA's...when he was SANS kidman! And as to the downloading statement, what of “I don’t even care if you download it (my music) illegally, give it to your friends, I really don’t care.” is there to misunderstand? He said he didn't care if you illegally download his music and give it away to friends...that is totally different from his pretty lame excuse at the grammys of "buy it and share it with your neighbor!" Orb just looks, big surprise, like a "reality" denying bumpkin..."sowwy, it was all just a big mistake...I didnt say what you clearly heard that I said!" Yeah Einstein, and your fly is undone too...
I agree with you Choice - Keithette was trying to cover up for his comments about downloading. He was 'in the moment' when he won that award thinking he was king of the universe. The funny thing is no-one has bought his CD and no-one is downloading it. BEcause it is a below average album!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is as over-rated as her. But that's another story for another blog.
Do you get the impression that she continues to forget why she's there at these events? On all of these tabloid pictures Keith appears there to support her looking decent, and sometimes required to have to chase after her like a bus boy at his own show because of her mental instability or when her lips got too bloated (e.g. CMA) I swear, he's being sucked out dry by her...needs to wake up fast!
Like Anon 4:13 PM wrote, if not already, there will be people damning her husband, causing them to reexamine his work, and drawing a strong conclusion that it stinks as well. We just assume and easy to pack them together as jokes or he's largy guilty by association (to her). Now her box office poison appeal/reputation is spreading into her personal life. Poor guy, he probably didn't bargain in his career when he got married to her....
Im trying to work out why you all loathe her. Is it because she is plastic, cant act, and is trying to hold back the years?
Oh OK, that makes sense then.
Hell, for myself, it's the way she chooses to exist as a star not to be taken seriously with respect and adulation worthy of a true actor. For close to a decade now, her actions, appearance, utterances, career performance and career track record were a little better (only because she spared us of not exposing her genital) than Paris Hilton & Britney Spears in her old age. Suggest revisiting her many antics exposed on this website and many others that ultimately confirmed what she really is, a high school dropout, and not a person of any substance as had carefully orchestrated over a decade ago that led her to an Academy award. With respect for her gone, we're not afraid to expose her shenanegans in real time as they occur -- which are so many, we're entertained by them.... She's really funny.
maclen - you're a classic
Keith always looks like a hairdresser to me - everything from his shiny suits, fake tan, and dyed and contrived hair-do. It thought country music was about rough and rugged but Keith looks about as rough and rugged as a boutique sales assistant. If I didn't know who he was, I was assume by looking at a picture that he was an effete gay man involved in fashion or cosmetics. Both Nicole and Keith look very fake and plastic and embarressing. Nicole looks like she is trying too hard. There is something very weird about them. Kitch. Barbie & Ken. Siegfried and Roy. Liberace. Mae West in the 1960s. Nicole & Keith.
Anonymous said...
"maclen - you're a classic"
Hey...anon...anonymous 1:40 PM I presume?...not to be mistaken with anonymous 4:12 PM? Well, thanks..I think? And I wholeheartedly agree with anonymous 11:58 AM, quote:
"With respect for her gone, we're not afraid to expose her shenanegans in real time as they occur -- which are so many, we're entertained by them.... She's really funny."
Ive been commenting on blogs for at least the past 4 or 5 years on how I thought kidman was a mediocre actress...also very bland and dull...and lacking in any personality at all! Certainly not enough to warrent all the acolades she recieved in her "season of mourning" shortly after being dumped by cruise. And I certainly predicted that her career would be in the proverbial basement...eventually...and she would no longer be receiving the multi "tens of million" dollar paydays...or not be recieving anymore major roles...and she would be basically reduced to standing on the corner of hollywood and vine, holding out a tin cup...and sporting a hand held sign reading, "will work for movie roles"
Celebs have a multitude of sources...magazines...talk shows...infotainment shows...and now online fansites and "carefully chosen" gossips sites to heap positive PR and gushing and lavish attention to their agenda...my simple agenda has been to counter it with my own spin on how I think some are not very good or are lacking in all the basic characteristics of being a success in the business they've chosen! And in kidmans case, she lacks personality, empathy or substance...or just plain and simple, she no longer has an interesting story to tell.
I have to add Anon 3:52 that Maclen is spot on with his analysis of this Kurban charade. His comments are very valued on this blog. Thanks Maclen.
Well, your welcome Choice...I'm just glad that your blog and Urban Myths give me a platform to rant my opinions! As it was commented earlier, it is fun and entertaining!
The Grannys. . . .
Hee Hee Hee
Thanks, Choice
Laura - couldn't agree with you more about Keith's look now. His hair is annoying. It has to be a hair-peice, the high forehead and long hair hanging down give it away. I guess he could borrow his wife's wigs for a new look if he wanted.
So do you think you are clever coming up with "The Grannys". I am a big fan of Nicole and dont understand why people call her Granny freeze. She looks amazing,and is not old looking at all. I bet you or anyone on here wont look so good when you are 42. Get a grip, and look in the mirror you bunch of idiots.
I was a fan of grannyfreeze over a decade ago, I do not think she looks amazing at all...amazingly pathetic with all that surgery and money spent to look like a shriveled prune but want to look youthful look. Well, some of us will strive to age gracefully when we get there...something she's obviously having a very difficult time with, so much her face and body parts keeps changing freaky each time. We're only speaking the truth as she presents herself to the world a lot more than we care to see, actually....
I saw her in a movie the other day and watched how nothing on her face moved. Very frightening. They would have saved loads of money by hiring a mannequin instead.
What's even more frightening is that she just doesn't get it that at her age generally people are not drawn to her as an actress for what she looks like or wears or about her (new) life perspectives and experiences uttered like coming of an age actor or her stands against causes that are more self-promiting than for what they are or ... God, the list goes on...what a pathetic aging person she is.
Anonymous said...
'What's even more frightening is that she just doesn't get it that at her age generally people are not drawn to her as an actress for what she looks like or wears or about her (new) life perspectives and experiences uttered like coming of an age actor or her stands against causes that are more self-promiting than for what they are..."
Now this is a very good and succinct comment that I clearly have been trying to highlight for the past few years. Well said! The truth of the matter, no matter how many cover stories on Vanity Fair or Vogue...or how many "sensational new revelations" kidman spouts while promoting a film...or the various cosmetic procedures she's had done...it is clear no one is buying it. Kidman is a relic...a exstinct dinosaur of the '90's...of the "heroin chic" of enemic emaciated and skeletal bodied women...and she is clearly tone deaf to the new and growing standards of what is fashionably and lalaland chic. While the trend is to more "shapely" women...started by jlo...and carried on by beyonce and mariah carey...kidman insists on remaining and even obtaining a far more thinner body. And that is an clear indication of how so out of touch she is to the changing fads of her own industry. She is just unable to adapt to the changing climate. And that is why she is fading.
Hey Maclen - I read your comment and aren't you forgetting something. She is trying to get with the changing faf to bigger women. She has that belly remember. And bigger boobs. Now all we need is her ass to be bigger too. Why dont you send her some KEntucky Fried chicken coupons. U have to admit, she is trying. that belly is a sure sign (or does she deliberately stick it out?)
Thanks Maclean...always marveled at your penmanship but then me thinks you're a pro ;) So spot on, that whole nk inc. is out-dated, so yesterday. We moved on, she's still mucking with people decades younger than her... About her orb husband, says her reply -- so "beautiful"-- inspired him to write music: write:http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20341272,00.html
Go figure, me thinks her reply is not beautiful, rather says she is not in love but is open to the possiblity...LOL! Geeze, he's a thick orb. Like Choice pointed out, what a couple, so deserving of one another....
Anonymous said...
"Hey Maclen - I read your comment and aren't you forgetting something. She is trying to get with the changing faf to bigger women. She has that belly remember."
Yeah, you mean her self described "pooch"...which was endlessly mistaken for her being "pregnant" for years! Clearly her fanatical work outs and dieting has taken care of that pooch. Well, she can look on the bright side...she and orb can share their clothes!
re anon 1:02 pm, the link is:
http://www.people.com/people/article/
0,,20341272,00.html
This is about how beautiful nk's reply was that her heart was open when asked how she felt about him. He was elated to write lyrics about it. Me thinks by that reply she's really saying that she's not in love but is open to the possibility of falling in love. This from your wife, and supposedly had your baby, now I ask you, is that great & to celebrate about?!?!?!?! Just pointing out how (possibly) dense or moronic this man is, as much as that stuff he said in public about (it's okay to) illegally downloading music. Thinking this man is really not too bright....
ANON 11:05
I know someone who met Keith and Nicole in Nashville and she said it was really hard to keep a conversation going with them. She added that THEY did not seem very bright at all. So your guess is good about Keith. We already knew it about Nic.
Anonymous said...
"Thanks Maclean...always marveled at your penmanship but then me thinks you're a pro ;) So spot on, that whole nk inc. is out-dated, so yesterday. We moved on, she's still mucking with people decades younger than her..."
Your welcome anony...and as to your "pro" compliment... far from it! Sometimes I get so "thumbtied" on the keyboard with all the thoughts and ideas...it's just a pleasure to read someone else who can convey a thought I also possess so succinctly!
Choice said...
"ANON 11:05
I know someone who met Keith and Nicole in Nashville and she said it was really hard to keep a conversation going with them. She added that THEY did not seem very bright at all."
Yes, Choice, I think that rather pitiful interview with seacreast on E! at at the SAGs clearly shows that that is true. The awkwardness, the blandness...the sheer volume of...DULL! As for kidman, and the time she has been at it...she is a limp fish simply floundering on the red carpet...yeah, just like a "Red Carp!" And she really should be given the "hook'...and made to make a swift exit...stage left!
Hi Maclen -
Nicole would put down her lack of conversation skills to being shy. Yet a shy person does not do that awful leotard transvestite magazine cover of late last year.
Do you have any thoughts Maclen on what will become of her movie RABBIT HOLE? From what I understand, they can not secure a distributor. Do you think that is because distributors have seen it and dont like the film? Is her acting as bad as it was in FUR?
Choice said...
Hi Maclen -
"Do you have any thoughts Maclen on what will become of her movie RABBIT HOLE? From what I understand, they can not secure a distributor. Do you think that is because distributors have seen it and dont like the film? Is her acting as bad as it was in FUR?"
Well, Choice, from what I had read back in mid January...basically the first info on the film since it finished filming back in july '09...the composer owen pallett is quoted as saying that he would be off scoring the film due to his having to promo his own album. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, that's about 5 months later...seems to me they are having problems with "post production" of the film which cant be good. Now IMDB states Fox searchlight is the distributor, and will put the film out sometime in 2010...but...then immediately states that it will distribute the film in the US and Canada in 2011! ...now other sources, like a promo piece in the NY times...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/movies/30ryzi.html
...which states...
"But it does not yet have distribution."
...and this other article, just recently from Variety,
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118014713.html?categoryId=3934&cs=1
..claims...
"Affinity Intl.'s "Rabbit Hole," now in post and starring Nicole Kidman and Aaron Eckhart, is creating anticipation among buyers curious to see the latest film from John Cameron Mitchell"
...which also indicates it still has no distibution! But I'm not surprised at all the confusion...this ragtag film...with its puny 5 week film shoot...$10mil budget...no frills movie sets...and as I suspect...not worthy of film trailers or tv spots if it actually makes it to theaters...or I mean..."theater"...(singular!) not even a website...I'm still inclinded to believe that those delays are just gonna sink it into the "direct to dvd" wasteland!
Thanks Maclen-
Sounds rather suspicious. Nicole's association with the film would have to be why it is getting any attention or distribution. Even with the lady's man Aaron Eckart as co-star, it cannot save it. Would be interesting to find out if Nicole took a dramatic pay cut for this role, since no-one pays her $18m anymore.
If Robert Downey jr couldn't save Fur, I doubt that Aaron Eckhart is going to be able to save The Rabbit Hole. It's probably going to be another flop!
Realizing that her career is in deep trouble and unable to star in commercially successful films, she continues to use the same career formula with her limited acting talents and wonders why her career never resurrects...and apparently attributing largely to aging and the way she looks...really sad. The rabbit hole by the movie gendre itself is not a money-maker, and she's just going to parade upright, rigid in it with see how sad I am facial expressions....
Post a Comment